Implications of P3 Findings
Life on earth could not survive without plants, yet their ecological role is
often invisible in modern society (Sanders, 2015). The P3 is a simple and
effective tool for increasing student interest and appreciation of plants: it
makes plants relevant in their daily lives, encourages careful observation,
and facilitates comprehension of lecture material. This project works
well in large lecture courses but could be adapted to smaller class settings
and/or implemented as part of high school biology curricula. For many
students, it was the first time they had ever grown a plant from seed.
Most significantly, the P3 greatly increased student interest in abstract
lecture topics that are typically challenging for students. When there is
a rapidly developing plant waiting at home each day, students witness
the effects of cellular changes in real time, making the learning experience much more meaningful. Activities that directly address plant blindness and botanical illiteracy are essential at all levels of education, but
even more so in high school and post-secondary education where students begin to form their own unique world view. Not only did P3
participants share their newfound fascination with plants in their daily
environment, but many students expressed a continued commitment
to care for and maintain plants in the future. Addressing plant blindness
will enable students to make better informed decisions about public policy as it relates to plants and the essential ecosystems they support.
All teaching materials associated with this activity can be accessed at
Baird, J. H., Lazarowitz, R., & Allman, V. (1984). Science choices and
preferences of middle and secondary school students in Utah. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 47–54.
Balas, B., & Momsen, J. L. (2014). Attention “blinks” differently for plants
and animals. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 437–443.
Balding, M., & Williams, K. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for
plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30, 1192–1199.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful
Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative
Learning [Book Excerpt, R. Furger, ed.]. Edutopia, George Lucas
Educational Foundation. Retrieved from https://backend.edutopia.org/
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An
Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston: Pearson.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind,
Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing
Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Crotty, M. (2003). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective
in the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future.
New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Darley, W. M. (1990). The essence of “plantness.” American Biology
Teacher, 52, 354–357.
Ebert-May, D., & Holt, E. (2014). Seeing the forest and the trees: Research
on plant science teaching and learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13,
Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Plants have a chance: Outdoor
educational programmes alter students’ knowledge and attitudes
towards plants. Environmental Education Research, 17, 537–551.
Gagliano, M. (2013). Seeing green: The re-discovery of plants and nature’s
wisdom. Societies, 3, 147–157.
Gimma, K. L., & Burgess, M. (2014, July). Establishing a learning landscape
to counteract plant blindness. Paper presented at Botany 2014: Annual
Meeting of the Botanical Society of America, Boise, Idaho.
Hershey, D. R. (1993). Plant neglect in biology education. Bioscience, 43,
Hershey, D. R. (1996). A historical perspective on problems in botany
teaching. American Biology Teacher, 58, 340–347.
Kellogg, J., Joseph, G., Andrae-Marobela, K., Sosome, A., Flint, C., Komarnytsky,
S., . . . Lila, M. A. (2010). Screens-to-nature: Opening doors to traditional
knowledge and hands-on science education. NACTA Journal, 54, 41–48.
LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39,
Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2002). The influence of an educational program
on children’s perception of biodiversity. Journal of Environmental
Education, 33, 22–31.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical
misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191–196.
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science
Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pettit, L., Pye, M., Wang, X., & Quinnell, R. (2014). Designing a bespoke app
to address botanical literacy in the undergraduate science curriculum
and beyond. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S-K Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and
Reality: Critical Perspectives on Educational Technology (pp. 614–619).
Dunedin, New Zealand: Proceedings ASCILITE.
Sanders, D. (2015). Plant blindness: Time to find a cure. The Biologist: Royal
Society of Biology, 62, 9.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of
Turkish Science Education, 4, 2–20.
Strgar, J. (2007). Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of
Biological Education, 42, 19–23.
Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3, 44–58.
Struwe, L., Poster, L. S., Howe, N., Zambell, C. B., & Sweeney, P. W. (2014).
The making of a student driven online campus flora: An example from
Rutgers University. Plant Science Bulletin, 60, 159–169.
Tomescu, A. M. F. (2009). Evolutionary gems of the plant world shine just
as brightly. Nature, 457, 956–956.
Uno, G. E. (1994). The state of precollege botanical education. American
Biology Teacher, 56, 263–267.
Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn
about plants? American Journal of Botany, 96, 1753–1759.
Wandersee, J. H. (1986). Plants or animals—Which do junior high school students
prefer to study? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 415–426.
Wandersee, J. H., Renee, M. C., & Sandra, M. G. (2006). A writing template
for probing students’ botanical sense of place. American Biology
Teacher, 68, 419–422.
Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness.
American Biology Teacher, 61, 82–86.
SHAWN E. KROSNICK ( email@example.com) is an Assistant Professor in
the Department of Biology, Campus Box 5063; JULIE C. BAKER
( JCBaker@tntech.edu) is an Associate Dean in the College of Education,
Campus Box 5116; and KELLY R. MOORE ( firstname.lastname@example.org) is a
Lecturer in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Campus Box
5042, Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville, TN 38505.