Kindfield, A.C.H. (1991). Confusing chromosome number and structure: a
common student error. Journal of Biological Education 25:193–200.
Kindfield, A.C.H. (1993). Biology diagrams: tools to think with. Journal of the
Learning Sciences, 3, 1–36.
Kindfield, A.C.H. (1994). Understanding a basic biological process: expert
and novice models of meiosis. Science Education, 78, 255–283.
Kreiser, B. & Hairston, R. (2007). Dance of the chromosomes: a kinetic
learning approach to mitosis and meiosis. Bioscene, 33, 6–10.
Levy, F. & Benner, D.B. (1995). Using ribbon models of chromosome
modifications to explore the process of meiosis. American Biology
Teacher, 57, 532–535.
Lewis, J., Leach, J. & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes? Young
people’s understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological
Education, 34, 74–79.
Lewis, J., Leach, J. & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000b). Chromosomes: the
missing link - young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and
fertilization. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 189–199.
Lewis, J., Leach, J. & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000c). What’s in a cell? Young
people’s understanding of the genetic relationship between cells,
within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 129–132.
Lock, J. & McDermid, H.E. (2005). Using pool noodles to teach mitosis and
meiosis. Genetics, 170, 5–6.
Luo, P. (2012). Creating a double-spring model to teach chromosome movement
during mitosis & meiosis. American Biology Teacher, 74, 266–269.
Marx, J.D. & Cummings, K. (2007). Normalized change. American Journal of
Physics, 75, 87–91.
Mathis, P.M. (1979). The use of manipulative models in teaching mitosis
and meiosis. American Biology Teacher, 9, 558–559, 561.
Maxwell, J.A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D.J. Rog
(Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed.
(pp. 214–253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McKean, H.R. & Gibson, L.S. (1989). Hands-on activities that relate mendelian
genetics to cell division. American Biology Teacher, 51, 294–299.
Mertens, T.R. & Walker, J.O. (1992). A paper-&-pencil strategy for teaching
mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting
examination performance. American Biology Teacher, 54, 470–474
Mézard, C., Jahns, M. T. & Grelon M. (2015). Where to cross? New insights
into the location of meiotic crossovers. Trends in Genetics, 31, 393–401.
Newman, D.L., Catavero, C.M. & Wright, L.K. (2012). Students fail to transfer
knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell
division. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 11, 425–436.
Oakley, C.R. (1994). Using sweat socks & chromosomes to illustrate nuclear
division. American Biology Teacher, 56, 238–239.
Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O. & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university
freshman students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about
mitosis and meiosis. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46,
Öztap, H., Özay, E. & Öztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary
school students: an investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish
teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38, 13–15.
Page, S. & Hawley, S. (2003). Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.
Science, 301, 785–789.
Page, S. & Hawley, S. (2004). The genetics and molecular biology of the
synaptonemal complex. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental
Biology, 20, 525–558.
Quinn, F., Pegg, J. & Panizzon, D. (2009). First-year biology students’
understandings of meiosis: an investigation using a structural
theoretical framework. International Journal of Science Education, 31,
Smith, M.U. (1991). Teaching cell division: student difficulties and teaching
recommendations. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 28–33.
Stavroulakis, A.M. (2005). Meio-socks & other genetic yarns. American
Biology Teacher, 67, 233–238.
Stencel, J. (1995). A string & paper game of meiosis that promotes thinking.
American Biology Teacher, 57, 42–45.
Stewart, J. (1982). Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning
basic Mendelian genetics. American Biology Teacher, 44, 80–82, 84, 89.
Stewart, J. (1983). Student problem solving in high school genetics. Science
Education, 64, 523–540.
Stewart, J., Hafner, B. & Dale, M. (1990). Students’ alternate views of
meiosis. American Biology Teacher, 55, 228–232.
Walker, J.D., Brooker, D.C. & Baepler, P. (2011). Pedagogy and space:
empirical research on new learning environments. EDUCAUSE
Quarterly, 34. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/12/pedagogy-and-
Williams, M., Haydel Debarger, A., Montgomery, B.L., Zhou, X. & Tate E.
(2011). Exploring middle school students’ conceptions of the
relationship between genetic inheritance and cell division. Science
Education, 96, 78–103.
Wright, L.K. & Newman, D.L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson
increases students’ understanding of ploidy during meiosis.
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39, 344–351.
Wright, S. & O’Brien, R.G. (1988). Power analysis in an enhanced GLM
procedure: what it might look like. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth
Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 1097–1102).
Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
KELSEY J. METZGER is an Assistant Professor of Life Sciences at the Center
for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota Rochester, Rochester, MN
55904; email: firstname.lastname@example.org. JOANNA YANG YOWLER is a Research
Fellow in the Department of Research, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Sock Mitosis and Meiosis Modeling Activity
Adapted from Wright and Newman, 2011 (1).
Instructor Preparation/Modifications to Wright et al, 2011 for implementation at UMR:
Instructions will include directive to model mitosis as well as meiosis