Bell, F., Wilson, B. & Hoppmann, R. (2015). Using ultrasound to teach
medical students cardiac physiology. Advances in Physiology
Education, 39, 392–396.
Han, S., Capraro, R. & Capraro, M. (2016). How science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U.S. Learning and Individual Differences, 51,
Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. & Dumais,
N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology
teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review. Studies in
Science Education, 52, 199–231.
Herper, M. (2017). An entrepreneur aims to peer inside the body with a
small, simple, cheap device. Forbes, October 27. https://www.forbes.
Holm, M. (2011). Project-based instruction: a review of the literature on
effectiveness in prekindergarten through 12th grade classrooms.
InSight: Rivier Academic Journal, 7(2), 1–13.
Hoppmann, R., Rao, V., Bell, F., Poston, M., Howe, D., Riffle, S., et al.
(2015). The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC)
for medical students: 9-year experience. Critical Ultrasound Journal,
Krajcik, J.S. & Czerniak, C.M. (2018). Teaching Science in Elementary and
Middle School: A Project-Based Approach, 5th ed. New York, NY:
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the Standard for
Project-Based Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Lawson, A. (2000). A learning cycle approach to introducing osmosis.
American Biology Teacher, 62, 189–196.
McNeill, K.L. & Krajcik, J.S. (2012). Supporting Grade 5–8 Students in
Constructing Explanations in Science: The Claim, Evidence, and
Reasoning Framework for Talk and Writing. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Moje, E.B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R. & Marx, R.W. (2001). “Maestro, what is
‘quality’?”: language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469–498.
Mouratev, G., Howe, D., Hoppmann, R., Poston, M.B., Reid, R., Varnadoe, J.,
et al. (2013). Teaching medical students ultrasound to measure liver
size: comparison with experiences clinicians using physical
examination alone. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25, 84–88.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By
States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Sanger, M., Brecheisen, D. & Hynek, B. (2001). Can computer animations
affect college biology students’ conceptions about diffusion & osmosis?
American Biology Teacher, 63, 104–109.
Schneider, R.M., Krajcik, J.S., Marx, R.W. & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance
of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure
of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39,
Thomas, J. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San
Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J.J. & Braten, M.L. (2018). Ambitious Science
Teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
CHRISTINE LOTTER is an Associate Professor of Science Education in
the College of Education at the University of South Carolina; e-mail:
firstname.lastname@example.org. RICHARD HOPPMANN is a Professor of Internal
Medicine, Director of the Ultrasound Institute, and Dean Emeritus at the
University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29209;
e-mail: email@example.com. STEPHANIE BAILEY is a Biology Teacher at
Airport High School in West Columbia, SC 29170; e-mail: smbailey@lex2.
org. NATHAN CARNES is an Associate Professor of Science Education in
the College of Education and Associate Director of the Center for Teaching
Excellence at the University of South Carolina; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
edu. DANIEL A. KIERNAN is a Senior Instructor of Biology in the Division of
Science, Mathematics and Engineering at the University of South Carolina
Sumter; e-mail: email@example.com.