Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory
physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
Harnish, R.J. & Bridges, K.R. (2011). Effect of syllabus tone: students’
perceptions of instructor and course. Social Psychology of Education,
Heim, A.B. & Holt, E.A. (2018). Comparing student, instructor, and expert
perceptions of learner-centeredness in post-secondary biology
classrooms. PLoS ONE, 13, e0200524.
Hirsch, C.C. (2010). The promising syllabus enacted: one teacher’s
experience. Communication Teacher, 24, 78–90.
Holt, E.A., Young, C., Keetch, J., Larsen, S. & Mollner, B. (2015). The greatest
learning return on your pedagogical investment: alignment, assessment
or in-class instruction? PLoS ONE, 10, e0137446.
Howard, J.R. & Henney, A.L. (1998). Student participation and instructor
gender in the mixed-age college classroom. Journal of Higher
Education, 69, 384– 405.
Jenkins, J.S., Bugeja, A.D. & Barber, L.K. (2014). More content or more
policy? A closer look at syllabus detail, instructor gender, and
perceptions of instructor effectiveness. College Teaching, 62,
Johnson, C. (2006). Best practices in syllabus writing: contents of a learner-centered syllabus. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 20, 139–144.
Johnson, C.C., Kahle, J.B. & Fargo, J.D. (2007). Effective teaching results in
increased science achievement for all students. Science Education, 91,
Kahl, D.H., Jr. & Venette, S. (2010). To lecture or let go: a comparative
analysis of student speech outlines from teacher-centered and learner-centered classrooms. Communication Teacher, 24, 178–186.
Lea, S.J., Stephenson, D. & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’
attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond ‘educational bulimia’?
Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334.
Marshall, J.C., Smart, J., Lotter, C. & Sirbu, C. (2011). Comparative analysis of
two inquiry observational protocols: striving to better understand the
quality of teacher‐facilitated inquiry‐based instruction. School Science
and Mathematics, 111, 306–315.
McCombs, B. (2003). Defining tools for teacher reflection: the assessment of
learner-centered practices. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting
of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April
McKeachie, W.J. (1999). Peer learning, collaborative learning, cooperative
learning. Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College
and University Teachers, 10th ed. (pp. 158–166). Boston, MA: Houghton
Nilson, L.B. (2016). Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for
College Instructors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Palmer, M.S., Bach, D.J. & Streifer, A.C. (2014). Measuring the promise:
a learning‐focused syllabus rubric. To Improve the Academy, 33,
Palmer, M.S., Wheeler, L.B. & Aneece, I. (2016). Does the document matter?
The evolving role of syllabi in higher education. Change: The Magazine
of Higher Learning, 48(4), 36–47.
Pedersen, S. & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the
implementation of a student-centered learning environment.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57.
Piburn, M., Falconer, K., Turley, J., Benford, R. & Bloom, I. (2000). Reformed
Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP). http://physicsed.buffalostate.
Piburn, M. & Sawada, D. (2000). Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol
(RTOP) Reference Manual. Technical Report. Tempe, AZ: Arizona
Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
Richmond, A.S., Slattery, J.M., Mitchell, N., Morgan, R.K. & Becknell, J. (2016).
Can a learner-centered syllabus change students’ perceptions of
student–professor rapport and master teacher behaviors? Scholarship
of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2, 159.
Roorda, D.L., Koomen, H.M., Spilt, J.L. & Oort, F.J. (2011). The influence of
affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school
engagement and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Review of
Educational Research, 81, 493–529.
Sawada, D., Eslamieh, C. & Wyckoff, S. (2003). Reformed teacher education
in science and mathematics: an evaluation of the Arizona Collaborative
for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers ACEPT. Tempe, AZ:
Arizona State University.
Sawada, D., Piburn, M.D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R. &
Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and
mathematics classrooms: the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol.
School Science and Mathematics, 102, 245–253.
Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture.
Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective
learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher
Education, 9, 87–98.
Slattery, J.M. & Carlson, J.F. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: current
best practices. College Teaching, 53, 159–164.
Smith, M.K., Jones, F.H., Gilbert, S.L. & Wieman, C.E. (2013). The Classroom
Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new
instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—
Life Sciences Education, 12, 618–627.
Thompson, B. (2007). The syllabus as a communication document: constructing
and presenting the syllabus. Communication Education, 56, 54–71.
Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches
to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 409–424.
White, B.Y. & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and
metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and
Instruction, 16, 3–118.
Wieman, C.E. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods
sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
USA, 111, 8319–8320.
Wieman, C.[E.] & Gilbert, S. (2014). The teaching practices inventory: a new
tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics
and science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 552–569.
Wiggins, G. & Mc Tighe, J. (1998). What is backward design. Understanding
by Design, 1, 7–19.
Wilson, J.H. & Wilson, S.B. (2007). The first day of class affects student
motivation: an experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 226–230.
Wright, G.B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23,
ASHLEY B. HEIM ( email@example.com) is a PhD candidate, EMILY R.
ALDOR ( firstname.lastname@example.org) was an undergraduate research assistant
at the time of manuscript submission, and EMILY A. HOLT (emily.
email@example.com) is an Associate Professor, all in the School of Biological
Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639.